🔗 Share this article

A digital rights group has stated to have scraped a vast number of songs from the popular streaming service and is preparing to publish them online.

Potential Impetus for AI Training

Observers noted the apparent leak could aid artificial intelligence firms searching for material to train their models.

A group called Anna’s Archive reported it had obtained 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million entries of metadata such as performer and record names. The company, which carries more than 100 million songs, stated that the breach did not constitute its entire catalog.

“We have identified and disabled the nefarious user accounts that engaged in unlawful scraping,” stated a company spokesperson.

The Swedish company, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, further explained that an investigation into unauthorised access identified a third party scraped public metadata and used questionable tactics to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Group's Stated Goal and Worries

Spotify does not believe the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to copyright-infringing books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group claimed the music files represented 99.6% of all music streamed to by its listeners and would be distributed via ‘torrents’, a method of sharing large data files online.

“Naturally the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great start,” said Anna’s Archive, which describes its mission as “preserving humanity’s knowledge and heritage”.

Model Development and Copyright Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ copyright, said the breached music would likely be utilized for developing AI models.

“Training on pirated material is unfortunately widespread in the tech sector, so this stolen music is almost certain to be used instructing AI models,” he said.

The group's website alludes to LibGen, a vast online archive of pirated books that has reportedly been leveraged by Meta to train its systems.

The co-founder of an AI startup posted on LinkedIn that individuals of the public could in theory “create their own personal free equivalent of Spotify”. The executive added it could also enable technology firms to “train on modern music at scale”.

Copyright has become a key issue between creatives, authors and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Government Considerations and Reactions

In the UK, artists and writers have raised concerns against a ministerial proposal to let AI companies use protected work without consent unless the rights holder opts out. Almost every respondent to a government consultation on the idea has supported artists’ concerns.

A government minister for technology, research and development told parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the matter, noting that ministers would “take the time to get this correct”. The administration has committed to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by March 2025.